WELCOME

You'll find this website optimistic about the future of public education in Minnesota . . . explaining the important innovation in schooling that has appeared here and how it now should and can be extended.

NEW August 1

CAN THERE BE CHANGE IN SCHOOLING WHEN PEOPLE DISAGREE SO SHARPLY ABOUT ITS DESIRABLE DIRECTION?

Yes: Such a change is possible. All it takes is dropping the notion that everyone must move now to some one ‘right way’ . . . which simply means letting those committed to conventional schooling stay with what they prefer while letting those ready for change have the different model they prefer. 


It means accepting the good sense in matching different forms of schooling to the differences among students, in the confidence that those now preferring conventional school will adopt the different as they come to see the ways it benefits them. 


• • •


The success of this strategy of gradual-change was evident last week in the Economist’s obituary of Simon Groot, the Dutch ‘seedsman’ who transformed the quality of vegetables is southeast Asia. 


Farmers there, with bad seed, had trouble selling what they grew, so remained poor. Using his experience in Holland with cabbages, Groot worked to show farmers in tropical Asia what hybrid seed, properly cultivated, could do. Most farmers were reluctant. Successful farmers trained their neighbors. It was clear the new vegetables were “healthy, profuse and vigorous”. Over 20 years farmer incomes doubled; even tripled. 


I found much about Groot on the Web; even, to my surprise, that Economist obituary. Google ‘Simon Groot’ and you can read it all. 


• • •


It might get you thinking about schooling . . . with its own long history of difficulty with change and improvement. It will surely get you thinking about the successful strategy of gradual change that occupied the lifetime of Everett Rogers . . . whose interest in 'the diffusion of innovation' began while watching farmers adopt — or not adopt — the improvements coming out of the experiment station in Iowa. 


You can read about Rogers, can see his ‘curve of adoption’, in this little booklet suggesting that conventional school is Obsolete. Think about how the process he describes might be used today in education. 


We don’t have to be trapped by the sharp disagreement between adults whose one ‘right way’ is to make conventional schooling more rigorous and the young people who want schooling to be related to their own interests to help them succeed in life. 


It is OK to do both. Doing-both is what we should be doing. 

Related

TWO SIMPLE ACTIONS BY THE LEGISLATURE CAN GREATLY IMPROVE MINNESOTA’S PROGRAM OF EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION

Through June this website carried a series describing the model of innovative schooling appearing in Minnesota. To see any or all of its five short parts, click here.

PART FIVE

As to the first recommendation for legislative action . . . It is ineffective —and unfair—to leave the responsibility for major change with the superintendency; with an appointed individual whose legitimate concerns about job and career are bound to limit the willingness to propose and the ability to secure substantial change in the district organization and its schools. Vesting the responsibility for policy leadership in an elected board chair will produce far better results.


As to the second . . . The nature of an administrative bureau is to regulate, to control, to standardize. It makes no basic sense to expect it to welcome in the organizations it oversees changes that depart from the uniform arrangement. The innovation that is now essential will develop only when innovation is affirmatively encouraged in schools willing to try the new and different. These today include some but not all of the chartered schools; some of the 'alternative schools and now a few of the districts. Part Five suggests where the Legislature can find entities to provide this encouragement.



Not to change is itself a major decision . . . one now carrying a substantial risk that a public system continuing to resist change will find itself quickly bypassed by private education and commercial digital schooling. 

Click to read PART FIVE

The two documents below describe the innovation sector of Minnesota public education, and explain how it developed

ABOUT

This website continues the thinking about public education in which I've been engaged since 1982. Something of my experience appears here.


Much of this work is collected on the website of the

The Center for Policy Design

LARGE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE:
Policy Design for
 Public Education, Healthcare, and Government

VISIT

YOUR THOUGHTS

I welcome your feedback and thoughts.

Contact Us